Inexperienced Amateurs
Inexperienced Amateurs 5200 Inexperienced Amateurs Inexperienced Amateurs offers reality style hardcore action featuring a mixture of unknowns and well-known porn performers.
$
Trial price $ 0
Monthly price $ 0.00
Our total rating: 0/10001

Inexperienced Amateurs

Reviewed 2011-10-25 l Last update on

Inexperienced Amateurs

Short Review

Inexperienced Amateurs offers reality style hardcore action featuring a mixture of unknowns and well-known porn performers. The collection is part of the Reality Gang network and comes with dozens of bonus sites to help add some value to its small collection. Does Inexperienced Amateurs have what it takes to make it to the top in this highly competitive category? Let's go inside the members area and find out together!

0/100 0
Sorry, this site is no longer available

Content

0/65
  • Exclusivity: 0/5
  • Updates: 0/5
  • Originality: 0/10
  • Quality: 0/15
  • Speed: 0/15
  • Quantity: 0/15

The collection here at Inexperienced Amateurs is very small at just 18 videos. Furthermore, the most recent update here is already over two years old. It's quite obvious that this site is no longer growing, and although some of the other sites in the included Reality Gang network are still updating actively, I wouldn't expect anything new for this one any time soon.

Although there are a few gals here that I admittedly did not recognize, most of the babes here are indeed well-known porn performers such as Summer Long, Riley Evans, Breanna Fox, and Adrianna Deville. The performers don't really seem like "inexperienced amateurs" to me, and the scenes, though filmed in a reality style, definitely have a pro-porn feel to them. The scenes begin with a camera guy trying to pick up chicks on the street or at the beach and continue on into pretty standard hardcore porn action with blow jobs, pussy licking, sucking, facials, and more. This really isn't the amateur action I was expecting from this collection.

Each scene here has an "HD" logo stamped on it, but unfortunately there are not any HD videos here at all. These flicks topped out at 640 x 480 pixels, 2600 kbps. These look just okay at their normal size, and enlarging much causes some noticeable quality loss. Frankly, it would be much easier for me to overlook the lack of HD videos if the site stuck to its intended inexperienced amateur theme.

Nav, Design & Features

0/25
  • Design: 0/5
  • Navigation Ease: 0/10
  • Features: 0/10

By featuring the lesser-known models on the tour pages, it seems that Inexperienced Amateurs is trying to make itself look a bit more amateur than it really is once you get inside. That being said, the tour pages at least offered the chance to see the kind of young, fit, white models you can expect to see inside the members area and offer some information about the included bonus package.

When you log into the members area for Inexperienced Amateurs, you'll find yourself smack in the middle of the Reality Gang network members area. Near the top of the page, you'll find a menu that lists all of the over 35 sites that are included with membership. You'll also find a list of the porn stars who appear on the network and a tag section that lets you access some basic category keywords. The network also offers a basic keyword search box.

Each scene is found on its own page where you can access the video and photo materials. The movies here are offered for streaming in flash format or for download in WMV format in your choice of full-length files or split pieces.

Cost

0/10

Members Area Screenshots

Conclusion

Inexperienced Amateurs has several pretty major issues including a tiny collection, a lack of updates, materials that don't seem to fit the intended theme of the site, and below average quality videos that are labeled as being HD. I can't really think of a good reason to join this site on its own merits, but it may be worth checking out the Reality Gang network as a whole.

Pros & Cons

  • + Exclusive hardcore scenes
  • + 35 bonus sites included
  • - Tiny collection
  • - No updates
  • - Vids not HD as stated
  • - Not really amateurs, I recognized most girls